The Ruin of Kings

Title: The Ruin of Kings
Author: Jenn Lyons
Publisher: February 2019, Tor Books
Blurb: There are the old stories. And then there’s what actually happens.

Kihrin is a bastard orphan who grew up on storybook tales of long-lost princes and grand quests. When he is claimed against his will as the long-lost son of a treasonous prince, Kihrin finds that being a long-lost prince isn’t what the storybooks promised.

Far from living the dream, Kihrin finds himself practically a prisoner, at the mercy of his new family’s power plays and ambitions. He also discovers that the storybooks have lied about a lot of other things things, too: dragons, demons, gods, prophecies, true love, and how the hero always wins.

Then again, maybe he’s not the hero, for Kihrin isn’t destined to save the empire.

He’s destined to destroy it . . .

**Massive thanks to Literary Agent Sam Morgan, for sending a copy in exchange for an honest review**


No one had higher expectations for this book than I did. Claimed akin to the greats, like Sanderson and Rothfuss, includes dragons AND written by a woman? I wanted this book to blow my mind. I wanted it to completely shatter my reality of what fiction could be, of what stories could do. I wanted to find a new author to admire, someone to look up to as a writer and be like, “I want to write like her.”

Lyons nailed it in every way.

This book was incredible. It was visceral, the pace was fast moving and the voice especially was fantastic, especially how it differentiated between the three narrators. Kihrin is in prison. He’s being tormented there by Talon, a woman–if she still has any claim to that label–who knows a lot of his story already and is responsible for most of the heartache in it. But she’s tormenting him by asking him to recollect this story, how he got to be in his cell, help pass the time a little bit. Yet he doesn’t start at the beginning, not according to what she knows. So she starts at the real beginning, according to her, while Kihrin gives his own account. Back and forth we go between the two, learning the complicated and heartbreaking story of Kihrin through two pairs of eyes, across two different timelines, all while sitting in a jail cell waiting to be sacrificed.

Of course, you can’t forget the third, who has transcribed this entire account down and has offered his own footnotes throughout the tale, listed as actual footnotes within the book.

39863237So, the way it was presented, through these three narrations, deserves nothing but a standing ovation, as it distinctly reminded me of how Rothfuss expertly messed with time and storytellers the same way, while also keeping up the high standard of intricacy and worldbuilding woven throughout this piece as Sanderson sets in his Stormlight Archive. As a debut novel, Lyons, in my opinion, is already an expert in the field.

Yet Lyons story is also such a breath of fresh air and her story is still unique. Her world is vast and incredible and it was impossible not to feel the absolute depth presented here. It feels like I could reach out and visit, it’s so real and has so much history–though I’m not sure it’s a place I would want to visit, considering the circumstances. Or the events that happen in the last 150 pages.

I love the characters, as well. I cheered for Kihrin the entire time and I couldn’t help but like Talon, even though I wanted to hate her. The wide company of side characters were each fleshed out and developed and everyone played a role. Some of the new races introduced here were amazing. I enjoyed learning about the lore a ton and I audibly expressed my surprise–or pain–a handful of times throughout the story. The way the story was presented–this intricate weaving of three narratives, past and present, all being told at the same time–was my favorite aspect, though. It was the intricacy level of Scott Lynch, one who I personally hold in high respect and regard; everything revealed at the perfect moment, creating the perfect balance of tension and revelation, while always making the reader continue to read without any choice on her part–even if it’s almost 3am and you should’ve went to bed hours before (oops).

This book was incredible, I can sum it up simply as that. I don’t think this review does this justice, not even close. If you’re a fantasy fan, you can’t afford to miss this book (which releases Tuesday, February 5th). Lyons has been compared–rightly so–to Sanderson, Rothfuss and Lynch (at least by me).

But I predict it won’t be before long before we’re comparing books to Lyons, instead.

Read on!

14 thoughts on “The Ruin of Kings”

  1. Oh man! I have to pick this up now. It sounds incredible. I love the historical footnotes bit. I was aware of this book just by seeing it on some people’s lists but I wasn’t really “aware” of what it is. Thanks Nicole!

    1. I think you’re definitely going to love the way it is written. SO unique and so provocative (in the sense that it definitely causes a reaction). Can’t wait to hear what you think!

  2. Great review, Nicole! You so succinctly brought out the strengths of this book. By the way, this is the first time I have visited your blog, and I loved it. I also liked your bio. 🙂

Leave questions, comments or angry remarks below...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.