Last Updated on August 17, 2020 by ThoughtsStained
I hope you’re all doing well as we start off another week. Life is about to get really hectic for me (I’ll have to write about that in another post!), so we’ll have to see how everything goes and how much of a balancing act I can pull off with everything. I’m also struggling because fall is my favorite time of year (please, can get stop with the 90+ degree weather dogs and start getting to the 70s?!), but I’m also a bit terrified for fall to come this year, since I doubt the pandemic is going to get better during the introduction of flu season…
But, I digress. That’s actually not what I’m hear to talk about today! Instead, I wanted to touch on a topic that I’m not really sure how to approach, so I think this post is just going to be a bunch of rambling until I figure shit out, so…apologies in advance? I want to talk about writing reviews and how I think I want my review style to change, but I’m not sure how to do that or what it’s going to look like (though, I hope I might figure it out, by the end of this post; spoiler alert: totally did).
You see, if you’re familiar with my reviews, they aren’t very structured–and I don’t think I’m looking to make that traditionally structured in any sort of way. I’m not trying to break down the plot, the characters, the structure, the pacing or anything like that (though, I do enjoy it when people are able to write something so in-depth!). I still really enjoy the fact that my reviews are centered in how a book makes me feel, rather than trying to read it critically, like I did for school.
It’s usually just a word vomit of my thoughts (which, all reviews are, in a sense). And I’ve been feeling…a little let down with my reviews, lately? They have always been the lowest in terms of engagement (and, let’s be real: they always will be, because they just aren’t as interesting in terms of the other content I write and publish). I just feel like they aren’t doing very much and they don’t really hit exactly where I want them to, because they are feeling…too generic, across all of my reviews? I dunno if that even makes sense, but that’s sort of what I’m feeling.
So, I want to improve. As someone who has a platform (I am almost up to 800 followers!? How did this happen!?
Even though I’m sure a 1/4 of that is bots, thank you so much for being here. Perhaps I’ll even get up to 1,000, one day?!!?), I think I need to recognize that and know that my reviews could potentially carry weight. As someone who reviews ARCs, I need to honor that agreement I made with the publisher and write quality reviews (and do a better job of reading them on time; but that’s for a later post). As someone who wants to create a safe space in her blog, I want to write reviews that people can trust and enjoy reading.
However, there are few things I don’t want to do, either:
- I’m still really not into the specific breakdowns of narrative structures and craft. While I do recognize that can be really helpful in highlighting strengths and weaknesses within a story, it’s honestly not my style. And I don’t want to sacrifice that.
- I don’t want to take notes while I read? Reading is one of the few things I do because I love it, for pure enjoyment. And while, through blogging, it has, at times, felt like a job and started to transition from a hobby to a responsibility, I want to try and hold onto making reading feel like a break from all of my responsibilities as much as possible.
So, where does that leave me?
I think I have an idea.
I definitely want to start incorporating trigger warnings at the start of every review. I think it is important to help protect readers to let them know what might trigger them before they read a book. I’m going to start utilizing Lauren Hannah’s Book Trigger list, as well as start adding books that I’ve read to this amazing database, created by Fadwa and Laura that aren’t there already.
(I recognize that some people don’t see the need for them or are worried about potential spoilers. But, even as someone who HATES SPOILERS, I’d rather spoiler someone than have them be accidentally triggered by a book they only read because my review made them want to. Plus, if your book is using a trigger as a major plot twist or reveal, perhaps you should look into why that is happening in the first place and make sure there is a valid reason to be doing that? 👀)
I also like including the details of the book (the title and author, of course, but also the publisher and the blurb), as well as any general notes (if it’s an ARC, if there are spoilers, that sort of thing). This I have always done, but I think I want to format it a different way. I’m not sure exactly how, yet, but I might mess with this, so stay tuned!
The main thing I think I’m going to change is how I write my reviews. Instead of writing a review in the way I usually do (free form thoughts), I’m going to try and break it down by my main three likes I enjoyed about the book and main three dislikes. That way, I can try and be a little more focused and a little less generic, it still focuses on my emotions (and I think I can do this without taking notes), but also gives me a little more structure, while also encouraging me to review the book ASAP after I finish it, so all of my thoughts are fresh!
I made a template blog post of what I think I’m going to include and how I want to structure it and I’m excited about this change! I’ve not been feeling as confident in my reviews as late and I’m hoping this change in format and restructuring, slightly, will spice them up in a way that I need to make writing them enjoyable again (and hopefully make them more enjoyable for you, too).
I’ll try this out with The Wolf of Oren-Yaro by K.S. Villoso, hopefully later this week, if not early not week, so please, let me know what you think of the new approach! And I’d love to hear about what you think about reviews in the comments below. Do you enjoy writing them? Do you have a certain style or way you approach them that you prefer to use? Anything you’d like to see differently, about mine? Let me know!
Thanks for reading!